Is contradictory how Ivins classified ornament, design, and craftsmanship; how he perceived these elements as individuals. I disagree with this opinion because these elements work as a whole to complete artworks successfully. Everything starts with an idea, that idea require certain type of design to be possible. While the style determined how much ornament or craft is needed to fulfill the artist intention in a specific piece. Is difficult to imagine how even in formal education style and ornament were separated into two different fields that go together (design and architecture). Also, is disappointed to realize how early craftsman's did not had the opportunity to explore new techniques because these improvements or new discoveries went only to a privileged group. Is complex the thought of craftsmanship not been consider in early art education as something that needs to be study and master.
The evolution of decorative art and the relationship with cultural associations is highly interesting, the idea of a particular piece of art evoking a culture; like Moroccan mosaics that determine that an object comes probably from that area of the middle east. Craftsman evolve as well, in the way a certain job was specific to someone; such as ornaments only made by painters. Nowadays any person even with no formal practice or education can explore art or craft making. Other important aspect is the way ornament or design can work as a tool of inspiration for artists. Institutions like museums and galleries must be aware of how the art world is changing and make their spaces more inclusive not only to the artists but also to their visitors and art aficionados; to expand the knowledge for the sake of all!
No comments:
Post a Comment